Dibyajyoti Purushottam

Dibyajyoti Purushottam
Prospectives of Past, Present & Future; And Foresightedness

Search My Blog

Showing posts with label Ethical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ethical. Show all posts

02 January, 2023

Euthanasia-2

02-Jan-2023: Euthanasia

Euthanasia, also known as assisted dying or mercy killing, is the act of intentionally ending the life of a person who is suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition. The aim of euthanasia is to relieve the person's pain and suffering, and to provide a peaceful and dignified death.

The issue of euthanasia is a complex and controversial one, with passionate arguments on both sides of the debate. Those in favour of euthanasia argue that it is a compassionate and humane way to end the suffering of terminally ill patients, while opponents argue that it is unethical and can be misused.

There are two types of euthanasia: Active and Passive.

Active euthanasia involves the administration of a lethal substance or injection by a physician or another healthcare professional, with the intent of ending the patient's life.

Passive euthanasia, on the other hand, involves withholding or withdrawing treatment or life-sustaining measures, such as ventilation or hydration, with the intent of allowing the patient to die naturally.

Arguments in favour of Euthanasia

One of the arguments in favour of euthanasia is the principle of autonomy, which states that individuals should have the right to make decisions about their own lives and their own bodies. Supporters of euthanasia argue that terminally ill patients should have the right to choose a dignified death, free from pain and suffering.

Another argument in favour of euthanasia is the principle of beneficence, which states that healthcare professionals have a duty to act in the best interests of their patients. Supporters of euthanasia argue that in some cases, ending a patient's life can be the most compassionate and humane course of action.

Argument against Euthanasia

Opponents of euthanasia argue that it is unethical and violates the Hippocratic Oath, which states that healthcare professionals should do no harm to their patients. They argue that euthanasia is a form of killing, and that it is morally wrong to intentionally end the life of another person.

Another argument against euthanasia is the potential for abuse. Critics argue that allowing euthanasia could lead to a slippery slope, where vulnerable patients, such as the elderly or disabled, could be coerced into requesting euthanasia by family members or healthcare professionals. They also argue that euthanasia could lead to a devaluation of human life, with the potential for it to be used as a cost-cutting measure by healthcare providers.

General

In many countries, euthanasia is illegal and considered a criminal offense. However, there are some countries where euthanasia is legal under certain conditions. In the Netherlands, for example, euthanasia is legal if the patient is suffering from unbearable pain, has a terminal illness, and has given informed consent. In Canada, euthanasia is legal under similar conditions, but only for adults who are capable of making their own decisions.

There are also debates about the role of healthcare professionals in euthanasia. Some argue that healthcare professionals should not be involved in euthanasia, as it violates their duty to do no harm to their patients. Others argue that healthcare professionals have a duty to provide compassionate care to their patients, and that euthanasia can be a part of that care in certain circumstances.

Conclusion

In conclusion, euthanasia is a complex and controversial issue that raises difficult ethical and moral questions. While some argue that euthanasia is a compassionate and humane way to end the suffering of terminally ill patients, others argue that it is unethical and has the potential for abuse. Ultimately, the decision to legalize euthanasia is one that must be made carefully and with consideration for the rights and dignity of all individuals involved.

Here is a list of countries where euthanasia is legal:

·       Belgium

·       Canada

·       Colombia

·       Luxembourg

·       Netherlands

·       Spain (only for terminal illnesses)

·       Switzerland (only assisted suicide is legal)

·       Victoria, Australia (only for terminal illnesses)

It is important to note that the laws and regulations surrounding euthanasia vary between countries and may have certain conditions and restrictions.

16 November, 2022

Dogs' Day Out

16-Nov-2022: A National Dog Policy in the backdrop of Stray Dog feeding controversy

Currently, there is a case pending in the SCI (Supreme Court of India) about who can feed a street dog and how?

Sometimes back I had written about dogs and how they enjoy the esteem of a very sizable and powerful section of the society. These developments made me think and come out with a suggestion for our country's dog policy which we don't have till now.

Two important points make it necessary for this serious thinking. They are:

  • On one hand we have a large population of dog lovers, pet dog owners, and we can't ignore their love for animals. We can't curtail their democratic freedom to express their emotion. Some sections of society and organisations plead for their life and dignity (Dog's Life Matters).
  • On the other hand, we have the grueling menace of street dogs, disturbance to residential areas, unsafe public interaction, and dangerous situations. Many instances of dog bite have occurred of late- a potential hazard to children, the weak, elders, etc.

Unfortunately, we can't have both situations uncontrolled. Many countries have Dog Policies. Our country doesn't have one. Why not have one now when the time is ripe?

It's on this backdrop, these suggestions have been based. They are the following:

  • Ban the street dogs completely. Subsequent points will tell how to manage the existing crowd of dogs.

  • Pet dogs must be registered with the local body or municipality renewable every 1 to 5 years by paying a reasonable amount of fees. This will eliminate non-serious pet owners. 

  • The municipality shall have adequate provision of veterinary and kennel services and may be funded by these fees.

  • The municipality may from time to time declare the prohibition of ferocious breeds, which must not be adopted as a pet.

  • There must be stringent rules & laws to control and establish public safety, preventing litter, and other guidelines. More of these in subsequent paragraph.